« 5 cgbvb April Fools Day hoaxes I didn't have time to pull off | Main | MPAAdvertising »

Exposed!

I need to get a-typing, if I'm going to meet my goal of reaching the 1000-entry plateau this summer. These entries won't write themselves. It's been a light first week, for various reasons. One of the biggies, though, is that I think I'm getting a little touch of arthritis in my right hand, which suggests to me that I need to rethink my current approach to mouse usage. It hurts when I type as well, but I think that my mice are curving my hand in a way that my knuckles aren't pleased with.

Anyhow, enough of the whine. One thing I wanted to note this week was Donna's entry about Jason Jones' interview with Steven Johnson. I'm a big fan of all of SBJ's books, but Ghost Map is one that I keep meaning to review (and in more detail than my discussion of it here). But the funny thing about Donna's entry was that I felt a little exposed. Not in any dramatic fashion or anything. But when she notes

Ah ha! I thought. So now I get the connection among many of the things Collin blogs about: Moretti, Johnson, and Latour, too.

I feel a little like I've had a secret made public. I'm not ashamed of my influences--far from it, in fact--nor of the fact that I have influences. We all do. But it's strange to have them named like that, the texts that recently have resonated with me and with each other. One of the things we do as academics is to assemble our own private bibliographic networks, and inevitably, the texts we value most highly drift towards the center of our network, and become the default frames that we bring with us both to subsequent reading and our own writing.

And interestingly enough, we don't always pay attention to each other's networks. Sure, every couple of years or so, there's a thread on a discussion list about the disciplinary desert island books, but even those threads ask us to represent the discipline. I would guess that most of those books/articles have very little to do with us personally. Moretti, Johnson, Latour, and others affect the way I see the world academically, but none of their works are rooted primarily in my discipline. I wonder from time to time about my colleagues' networks, and about what it would tell us about each other if we could generate and share an honest "cloud" of our influences.

It makes me curious to go back and assemble all of my bibliographies (the way that Derek did with coursework a ways back) and to see if there are patterns that I can detect. Are there thinkers I rely upon unconsciously? Probably. But for the moment, I'm going to pursue the various angles that writers like Moretti, Latour, and Johnson supply me, because I'm not close to done with them yet.

That is all.

Comments

Apropos mouse usage, the best thing is as little as possible; keeping your hands on the keyboard is faster anyway. It's not as easy in Mac OS as with most *nixes or Windows, but learning the alternatives (ctrl-F2, ctrl-F3, etc) is worth it.

And to think I was worried about exposing Jason--it was you I should have been worried about!

I thought it was cool the way things suddenly clicked for me when I saw Johnson mention Moretti. So I had to share! Sorry if it was somewhat weird. My memory works in strange ways, methinks.

Think nothing of it, Donna, seriously. No apology necessary.

It was cool for me when I first heard SBJ talk about Moretti (on his blog, maybe a year ago). Until then, I'd connected the two for myself but hadn't realized that the connection was more concrete than that. In the broader sense, I think that this is something that we all do--put together thinkers or texts into resonant assemblages--but we don't really discuss those assemblages, except occasionally in retrospect. It's interesting to think about, though...

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)